Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Author: ksrl

August undefined, 2024

WebJan 11, 2016 · The RF 70-200/2.8 is my favourite major-change lens. To me, the size and weight difference over the EF is very real, and well-worth the telescoping action. Probably the RF70-200/4 is a huge improvement in usability too, but I've never shot with it. I like it even better than the RF100-500 vs the EF100-400. ••• WebWelcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. We also sometime talk about other canon equipment such as printers. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome!

RF vs EF lenses - Canon Europe

WebNo loss in image quality or autofocus performance, at all, when using a basic EF-to-EF-M or EF-to-RF adapter. All a basic adapter does is push the lens out to be the correct distance from the sensor in order to properly focus the light, and extend the electrical contacts out so that the body can communicate with the lens. WebHelp me decide: Fujifilm X-T5 vs Canon EOS R8. after neglecting my beloved hobby in the last few years/unpacking my cameras far too seldom, the fascination grabbed me again. After some market research, I came across camera models that caught my attention: the Fujifilm X-T5 and the EOS R8. I know that these are two very different cameras, and to ... elevated inversion layer

r/canon on Reddit: Is the RF 24-105 f4L IS USM worth the price over the ...

WebNov 23, 2024 · For this purpose these lenses have been compared: Canon RF 50mm 1.2L. Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L. Canon EF 50mm 1.2L. … Web4. FantasticGlass • 7 mo. ago. The L series RF glass handles CA and flaring better and is a bit sharper wide open. But compared to the most modern EF glass it's actually pretty close. The biggest difference I noticed was CA, the RF L glass has basically none. It's impressive. WebWelcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome! elevated inventory

EF vs RF lens construction : r/canon - reddit.com

EF 24-70 vs RF 24-70 : r/canon - reddit.com

WebCanon and Sony prices are comparable for similar quality but Sony does have far more lower-end lenses, plus third-party lenses. Both systems adapt EF lenses well (use the Sigma MC-11 for Sony). Canon has some unique RF lenses that might push you to them. The 70-200 f2.8 is VERY compact. WebJan 11, 2016 · EF traditionally had both types of zoom operation. All of the big white RF models so far are extending zooms: RF 70-200/2.8 RF 70-200/4 RF 100-500/4.5-7.1 … elevated ipth icd 10WebThe RF 24-105 f4 is larger and heavier, but optically superior, aside from the constant f4 maximum aperture. It is weather sealed and has both a control and focus ring. The RF 24-105 f4-7.1 is small and light and forms a very small fullframe package combined with the RP. The tradeoffs of the f4-7.1 are: elevated iop od icd 10

"WebHmm the specs on the 80d are decent other than crop sensor. I think the RP is a good step up - but only if it’s cos you don’t want to spend a few extra $ on the R. If you want a rugged body the canon rp is perhaps not the way to go. I played with one at the canon gallery in Osaka Japan last week. " - Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

How good are the EF lenses vs. the modern mirrorless equivalents ...

WebOptically, the RF50/1.2 and RF85/1.2 L's are worlds better than the EF variants. They are much faster in AF speed and their sharpness when shot wide-open is unreal. Whether that's worth it to you or not, that's up to you to decide, but for someone that values these aspects, it is very much worth it. 19 MintyMarlfox • 3 yr. ago WebIt's going to take a long time before Canon will be fully transitioned from EF to RF and because of that, Canon has announced a hand-full of EF-RF mount adapters for using …

Did you know?

WebJun 6, 2024 · The Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens - an optical masterpiece. Neat 6 minutes video by BorrowLenses telling differences between Canon’s RF mount for mirrorless cameras and EF mount for …

WebIt is the spiritual successor of the EF-S 55-250MM F4-5.6 IS STM and the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM lenses. If you have tried either of those older lenses and liked them, you will probably like the RF 100-400mm. I own the EF-S 55-250mm, and it may be my favourite lens I have ever owned. WebEF 100-400 II vs. RF 100-500. I recently picked up an R6 Mark ii and I’ve been trying to decide which lens to buy out of these two. I’m going to be using these primarily for wildlife, which I don’t have much experience with, but I’ve heard so many different opinions about which lens is better.

WebThese include a 24-105 f4 L, 35 f2, 50 f1.8 and 18-135 USM. I love using the 80D/35 f2 as a walk around setup. If I trade in all my crop sensor kit to mpb.com, I should receive around £750, according to a recent quote. The cost of a second hand R6 is around £1,900 while an R7 is around £1,400 (both including ef-rf adaptor). WebRF vs EF 24-70 2.8. I just ordered the R6. And now am looking into a buying a 24-70 2.8. I’m in debate with myself about the following choice. The RF 24-70 or the EF 24-70 ii. The second one is regularly available as second hand and gives room for another second hand lens. But the built quality of je RF is way better.

WebEF 70-200mm f/4 vs RF 70-200mm f/4. I've been looking into getting a 70-200mm type lens for my EOS RP. If money was no object I'd probably go with the RF versions since it seems to have some slight advantages but I found some great deals that made me question whether the EF might be the way to go. The RF F/4 goes for around 1250 euros while I ...

WebNov 23, 2024 · Specifically the 24-70mm ($600 more for RF), and the 70-200mm ($800 more). If you have existing EF lenses, I would run with those for now. I have three EF … foot hassockWebReddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. ... Mostly EF L lenses at the moment using the adapter. 24-70mm 2.8L II 70-200mm 2.8L II 16-35mm 2.8L III 85mm 1.4L 50mm 1.4 ... [New … elevated ionized calcium with normal pthWebThe EF lenses will adapt onto the R-series bodies and work the same as—if not better than—on DSLR bodies, so there's definitely nothing wrong with buying a EF version and adapting it, especially considering the price difference between EF and RF. elevated iron and tibcWebRF 35mm 1.8 vs RF 16mm 2.8? Hey everyone I'm in a debate with myself about these two lens. So I currently have a Canon EOS R with 24-105mm F4 L USM. I want to get the 35mm F1.8 for night, street, Astro, full body portraits with blurry background. It's also on sale at the moment of $300 instead of $400. My dad the other day said he wants to get ... foot hard skin remover creamWebIn the image quality comparison equalized at f/4, the two lenses are similar overall, with each having some advantages at specific focal lengths. The f/4 lens has stronger geometric distortion and has stronger lateral CA. The f/2.8 has stronger peripheral shading in most equalized comparisons. elevated iop right eyeWebRF lenses have to be placed much closer to the sensor than EF, so if you have a mirrorless RF body you can adapt EF lenses to it, but there's no way to do this in reverse (you'd have to somehow jam the lenses almost an extra inch into your camera.) 3 kickstand • 21 days ago EF or EF-S lenses only. Not RF, not EF-M, not the old Canon FD. 2 elevated iron and ferritin icd 10WebMost Canon EF lenses should work fine or better on the R6. Some exceptions do exist, impacting AF coverage and / or fps. With 3rd party lenses there is a higher risk of the same issues occurring, especially with older ones that can't be updated - some of them use lens ids that Canon used for lenses that don' t perform well on the R series. foot hasting st manvieu